Technology

1.Technology 2. What i already know.

Who?- Scientist What?- Radios and guns were part of the techonolgy during the world war1. When?- From 1914 to 1918 How?- Will look it up. Why?- Technology was needed to communicate with your troops. did this impact the class topic or visa versa?- It helps us understand how technology helped the war members.

3. What i want to know.

Who?- Who created the radio and guns that they used. Why?- Why did they use radios to communicate instead of walky talkys. Where?- Where did they have the radios and guns when they were not being used. When?- When were radios created? How?- How did they create the radio? Impact?- What was the impact of the radios and guns and how did it change the future of the radio and new guns?

4. My research stategies.

Who?- Me Where?- School, home, and library How?- Working hard When?- Before and after school What?- Wiki and other good websites Key word searches-"WWI" "Technology of WWI" "Guns during WWI"

__Draft__ Technology influenced World War I by expanding the types of weapons; which impacted the outcome of the war. The technology really expanded to be a big part of the war.

The Machine guns shot many bullets at once so there was a higher kill rate. "In 1915 British Admiral Jacky Fisher wrote, The war is going to be won by inventions.” "At the beginning of the war the Vickers was the British army's standard machine gun. The Vickers was a modified version of the Maxim Machine gun. Using a 250 round fabric belt magazine, firing over 600 rounds per minute and a range of over 4,500 yards it earned a reputation of being a highly reliable weapon." " Technologically, great strides had been made in just about every area that might come into play during war. But the costs had been dear, and the end only temporary. Deaths from “The Great War” have been estimated at 10,000,000, and the end of the war itself, the Treaty of Versailles and its humiliating terms for Germany, laid the groundwork for World War II. The war was called “the war to end all wars,” and at the time that seemed possible. Unfortunately, it would prove untrue in less then a generation."

Tanks could only move at a speed of 4 mph they could not go after any of the other enemies."Germany began experimenting with flame-throwers in 1900. These powerful weapons used pressurized air, carbon dioxide, or nitrogen to push oil through the nozzle. The oil was ignited by a small charge and became a jet of flame. These machines were mainly used to clear enemy soldiers from their front line trenches. They first had a range of 25 meters, but were later increased to 40 meters." The advance in technology increased in the number of deaths and injuries because these weapons were so much stronger and could shoot many more bullets at one time. The technology during the war was so advances that whoever had the better technology would have a better chance of winning the war. The countries with the best technology were the European countries, they had some of the best new tanks and the best new guns to fire faster and harder.

Technology was very important during the war and decided who won."The winners were the //**ALLIED**// nations which included Belgium, France (and its empire), the UK (and empire; australia, newzealand, india, canada, New foundland and south africa aswell as some smaller states),cjapan, Italy (by the end), the Russian Empire (who had surrendered early but had held their own for a while), portugal and the US, who helped out more economicaly than physicaly." These countries had the best technology therfore they won the war.

During the war the technology was what possibly the deciding factor of the war. This war was the new beginning of technology advancment in weapons and radios. This war will go down is technology history.

code code Works Cited code "Encyclopedia." //Encylopedia Britannaica//. Encylopedia Britannaica, 2010. Web. 26 Mar. 2010. code code Kent, Zachary. //World War I "The War to End Wars."// Springfield: Enslow, 1994. Print. code code "World War I Technology." //World War I Technology//. N.p., n.d. Web. 29 Mar. 2010. code code . code code "World War 1 Technology." //World War 1 Technology//. N.p., n.d. Web. 29 Mar. 2010. code code []. code Paraphrase || No quotes or paraphrasing used. || Very few quotes or paraphrases included, no parenthetical references. || Some errors in quoting or paraphrasing and/or a few missing parenthetical references. || Several quotes and paraphrased pieces of information in each body paragraph, all with parenthetical references. || 4 ||
 * || 1 || 2 || 3 || 4 || Score ||
 * Thesis || No thesis. || Thesis is present in introductory paragraph but is not well-written. || Thesis included in introductory paragraph is satisfactory if a bit obvious. || Thesis included in introductory paragraph is well-written and interesting. || 4 ||
 * Flow || Paper is difficult to read and understand. || Paper is full of short, choppy sentences and topic shifts with no transitions. || Some use of transitional words and phrases but the paper is a bit choppy at times. || Use of transitional words and phrases as well as topic sentences makes the paper easy to read from start to finish. || 3 ||
 * Quotes/
 * Commentary / “My Ideas” || No commentary. || Commentary lacking in a few places. || Commentary included with each quote or paraphrase, but it is a bit obvious or repetitive. || Thoughtful commentary included with each quote or paraphrase. || 4 ||
 * Works Cited || No works cited page included. || Works cited page is included but there are several errors. || Works cited page is included but there are a few formatting errors. || Works cited page is included and is correctly formatted. || 4 ||
 * Conventions || Difficult to understand. || Several errors. || A few errors. || Little to no errors in grammar, spelling or punctuation. || 4 ||

Remember to put a conclusion at the end of your draft.-4 Paraphrase || No quotes or paraphrasing used. || Very few quotes or paraphrases included, no parenthetical references. || Some errors in quoting or paraphrasing and/or a few missing parenthetical references. || Several quotes and paraphrased pieces of information in each body paragraph, all with parenthetical references. || 3 ||
 * || 1 || 2 || 3 || 4 || Score ||
 * Thesis || No thesis. || Thesis is present in introductory paragraph but is not well-written. || Thesis included in introductory paragraph is satisfactory if a bit obvious. || Thesis included in introductory paragraph is well-written and interesting. || 4 ||
 * Flow || Paper is difficult to read and understand. || Paper is full of short, choppy sentences and topic shifts with no transitions. || Some use of transitional words and phrases but the paper is a bit choppy at times. || Use of transitional words and phrases as well as topic sentences makes the paper easy to read from start to finish. || 3 ||
 * Quotes/
 * Commentary / “My Ideas” || No commentary. || Commentary lacking in a few places. || Commentary included with each quote or paraphrase, but it is a bit obvious or repetitive. || Thoughtful commentary included with each quote or paraphrase. || 4 ||
 * Works Cited || No works cited page included. || Works cited page is included but there are several errors. || Works cited page is included but there are a few formatting errors. || Works cited page is included and is correctly formatted. || 4 ||
 * Conventions || Difficult to understand. || Several errors. || A few errors. || Little to no errors in grammar, spelling or punctuation. || 4 ||